Public Constraint: Corporate Formation and Value Transfer Model

Entity: GhostDrift Mathematical Institute (GMI) Document Type: Structural Definition / Public Constraint Purpose: To place the organization under publicly observable constraint regarding its corporate formation and economic activities.

1. Corporate Formation as Responsibility Fixation

GMI transitions from a voluntary research entity to a corporate body to implement Responsibility Fixation.

In informal or non-contractual activities, the locus of responsibility remains within the individual's conscience, leading to "Responsibility Evaporation"—a state where failure cannot be externally verified.

Structural Intent:

• Before: Responsibility relies on internal intent (Unverifiable).

• After: Responsibility is fixed to a corporate variable (Verifiable via contract and finance).

We establish a corporate entity to ensure that the boundaries of responsibility, failure, and verification are strictly defined and not diffused into personal discretion.

2. Value Transfer Model (3-Layer Structure)

GMI engages in economic activities to generate revenue. We define our financial model as a Value Transfer Infrastructure.

We generate revenue in high-value business areas to transfer resources to areas where economic rationality fails to capture value.

The 3-Layer Architecture

1. Revenue Layer (Economic Rationality) Generate revenue in markets where economic logic applies and clear market value exists.

2. Rigor Layer (Auditability) Maintain and expand mathematical models, verification assets, and implementation logs in a form that allows third-party PASS/FAIL auditing.

3. Culture Layer (Preserved Mismatch) Maintain and propagate values that underpin social decision-making but are difficult to measure economically—language, artifacts, education, rituals, commons, and external fixations.

   Definition of Culture: Here, "Culture" is not defined as an atmosphere or efficiency tool. It is the sum of reproducible artifacts that preserve the mismatch between economic rationality and reality. This mismatch is the source of the GhostDrift concept.

3. Protocol of Attribution

High compensation for founders or core members, should it occur, is not considered a structural defect. The critical metric is not the amount, but the correct attribution of value.

GhostDrift deals with high-reproducibility-cost intellectual assets:

• Irreversible decision-making structures

• Mathematical fixation of responsibility boundaries

• Concept design with verification possibilities

If these assets generate high market value, the compensation is a result of correct attribution. Disguising this value as "volunteerism" or "dedication" obscures the locus of responsibility and distorts the evaluation function.

4. Non-Concealment of Deviation

This document serves as a Public Constraint.

It is not a pledge of perfection or a promise that we will never deviate from our ideals. Rather, it is a design specification to ensure that if deviation occurs, it cannot be concealed.

GMI proceeds only in a form that satisfies observability and verifiability.